

I recently watched the movie Angels & Demons, a kind of sequel to the popular DaVinci Code.
Despite the fact that this is not typically the kind of movie I would like, I thought it was rather well done. Entertaining.
I was however, and needless to say, greatly disappointed with the ending.
Perhaps that has something to do however, with the Catholic Church’s historical genocide, wars, torture, and murder practices against all cultures and faiths not their own? Any objective historian could point you to numerous records. But you don’t need to take someone else's word for it, all you need do is go to a library, and look for yourselves. Perhaps you’ll learn something you didn’t know before?
A US judge has ruled that negligence by army engineers led to massive flooding in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. Does this conclusion actually surprise anyone? Rat #!#$%ing bastards.
Star Trek phaser invented! Cool! Only works on worms. Damn.
Pharmaceutical company discovers 'Female Viagra'. Researchers concede many men still won’t get laid, because the drug can’t change the fact that they’re still jerks.
Comedian Will Farrell simply isn’t funny. When Forbes magazine crunches the numbers and announces to the world you’re the most over-paid film star in Hollywood ...Wow, that’s gotta suck …
Travel ban? HIV positive individuals are not legally allowed to enter this country. Regardless .....
Why, you may ask, do I consider this important?
It is, on a personal note, the reason I do not, nor have I ever had a passport. It is also a significant factor in why I have never traveled outside the United States. Even to Mexico or Canada. I was afraid to.
My own government could have legally prevented me from re-entering the country. Where I was born, work, pay taxes and am a citizen. I know it sounds ludicrous, but it’s absolutely true. The law on this matter is ridiculously vague and arbitrary. (It is, on a related note, a profoundly ignorant and fearful law as well. A law that doesn't actually accomplish anything but the further spread of fear and ignorance.)
I choose to believe that my own country would elect to allow me to return home, but technically I would be breaking Federal law.
I just want to apologize in advance if I'm rude to anyone. Well, anyone that doesn't deserve it. (If you do deserve it, you may want to consider wearing kevlar, or perhaps carrying holy water and wooden stakes.)
Think of it as Über-PMS.
Ask any third-grader why the Pilgrims first came to this country and they will probably recite in a rather rote fashion, "To escape religious persecution" Ask any fifth-grader what the First Amendment says and they will similarly recite something about "freedom of religion," or "the free exercise thereof". Is that what most Americans really believe? And more importantly, is it really what they practice?
Are they willing to extend the same rights and protections to belief systems that are not their own? Based upon my personal experiences? HA! Not hardly.
Somehow America has interpreted these historical, legal and political landmarks as "freedom to choose whatever version of Christianity you prefer." And that's it.
This Thanksgiving be grateful that you're not being dragged from your home, that your money and assests aren't being seized. That you're not being arrested, imprisoned without trial, tortured and executed ... because your version of Christianity isn't the majority. And then extend those same basic rights, respects and dignity to your neighbors who might not be Christian at all. Because they're still Americans.
There's a big, wide world out there, and we're just a small part of it.
|
Religion
|
Adherents
|
|
Christianity
|
2.1 billion |
|
Islam
|
1.5 billion |
|
Secularism/agnostic/atheism
|
1.1 billion |
|
Hinduism
|
900 million |
|
Chinese
traditional
|
394 million |
|
Buddhism
|
376 million |
|
Animist
religions
|
300 million |
|
African
traditional
|
100 million |
|
Sikhism
|
23 million |
|
Juche
|
19 million |
|
Spiritism
|
15 million |
|
Judaism
|
14 million |
|
Bahá'í
Faith
|
7 million |
|
Jainism
|
4.2 million |
|
Shinto
|
4 million |
|
Cao
Dai
|
4 million |
|
Zoroastrianism
|
2.6 million |
|
Tenrikyo
|
2 million |
|
Neo-Paganism
|
1 million |
I ran across a strange article today about a “Nude Pumpkin Run” in Boulder, CO. By the BBC News of all sources. Apparently, it’s a yearly tradition in which happy, Halloween-revelers don a pumpkin over their heads and then run nude through the public (i.e. outside) “mall”, en masse.
I’m not shocked by things like this. I’m merely curious how something like this could have evolved into such a large event, much less a tradition.
The truly curious part of this story however is so subtle, it’s easy to miss.
Local police were successful in discouraging the nude, “pumpkin run” this year, by threatening the full prosecution of the law. Apparently being charged with indecent exposure makes one eligible for registry as a sex offender.
What?!!
People in this country commonly understand that persons registered on this list are all rapists and pedophiles, Not streakers, or skinny-dippers, etc. This list follows you for life. Everywhere you go.
Leave it to a bunch of uptight, puritanical nitwits to not only abuse the intent/spirit of the law, but to confuse nudity with sex. I am reminded of an old Southern proverb: What is the difference between “naked” and “nekkid”? “Naked” means you have no clothes on. “Nekkid” means you have no clothes on, and you’re up to “no good”.
Take a lesson America, from Oregon, which has no “nudity” laws, per se. In Portland it is technically legal to appear in public nude. So how does local law enforcement discern who is merely naked and who is “nekkid”? Easy. “Nekkid” people are charged with “disorderly conduct”, “public nuisance”, or worse. Actual behavior being the focus of the law, rather than a “state of being”. As it should be.
Granted, I don’t want to see most people without clothes on, nor would I personally ever appear in public nude. (Yes, you can all let out a collective sigh now …) But that's my choice, and I am not going to jail nudists and streakers and throw them in the same category as rapists and pedophiles either.
Sheesh. Grow the fuck up already America.If you still blush or giggle every time someone says "penis" or "boobs", perhaps you should go back to Fourth grade. And stay there.
ASIDE:
Personally, I don’t want to be around people who douse themselves in buckets of perfume or cologne, can’t tell the difference between “inside” and “outside voice” when they’re on their cell phones, or who tell “fag” jokes. But that doesn’t mean I think they should actually be illegal.
What do you think? Yeah or nay?

This just simply won't do ....
I just really dislike all of their "boxy" templates, and think most of the styles they provide are "cute". Which I hate. I'm afraid I'm going to have to give myself the latest crash course in CSS as well. Which I also hate. I call it the "cookie cutter" computer language.
As with most coding related issues however, the exact "how to" is never explained well, or even centralized. I guess I have to do a little "going back to school" to figure out their proprietary system. Believe it or not, most IT geeks are NOT particularly skilled communicators, or teachers. "Shocking!" I know ....
Whenever I have to wade through someone else's system of doing things, it always feels like trying to decipher someone else's shorthand. I'm just waiting for some 14 year old to bounce up and say, "It's easy!", and then for me to kick them in the groin. Figuratively speaking.
Wish me luck. I may curse this damn computer before long.
|
Wasn't I supposed
to gain great wisdom in exchange for my youth and beauty? |
|
RE:
Where's MY stimulus package? Screw
'Wall Street' and all those other unscrupulous, bloated corporate hogs
... Where's my stimulus package? Please indicate your preference, and we will recommend that the President send one to every American household.
|
|
Birthday-Smirthday Perhaps asking questions
like that is the true puprose of having birthdays in the first place.
I don't know. If so, it seems like a fairly unpleasant excercise, hardly
appropriate for celebration. |
|
Thanks to the wonders of technology, I am now able to watch TV on my computer. Moreso, I found I was able to do something a bit surprising this morning. Looney Tunes, the Herculoids, Super Friends and the like awaited every kid at 7AM, Saturday morning. On CBS, NBC or ABC. There was nothing else. Saturday morning was the sole domain of children. And cartoons ruled supreme. Every kid who had a television could watch them. Not so anymore. If you turned on "Saturday
morning cartoons" these days, you would be sadly disappointed. Educational
programming and infomercials rule the morning airways. Bugs bunny, Space
Ghost, Scooby Do are all valuable "real estate" now owned by
the Cartoon network, and other cable moguls. They represent big bucks,
and children really aren't the most important part of the equation anymore.
|
|
Let's Play Scruples .... OK ...I don't want
to bias you with any more background information, or details. I'd just
like to play a short round of the popular game Scruples
with you. What, if anything, do you do? [All opinions are welcome, as long as they're truthful. Thanks] |
| Summer
... You know ... When I was a small child, we still had an ozone layer. Short of getting a nasty sunburn, it was actually HEALTHY to run around outside and get some sun. Even
if you went to the beach, you might have put some zinc on your nose, or
maybe some sunscreen on your face and shoulders (i.e." hot spots").
Getting "a little pink", or getting a "racoon face"
wasn't going to kill you. People just did not slather their entire bodies
down with SPF 3000.Beaches smelled of women wearing coconut oils. The general public had never heard of hydrofluorocarbons, or carcinomas.( As I mentioned, we still had an ozone layer.) If you started to get burnt, you just put on a hat, shirt or sat in the shade. Imagine that. People weren't obsessed with getting tans anyway. It is the year 2009, and ironically enough, we now know that there is UV "A" and UV "B". All those sunscreens you were so diligent about putting on in the 80's and 90's may not have protected you at all from deadly cancer or worse yet ... the wrinkles of "premature aging". <insert maniacal laughter> Wow. I think that
was my first, official "When I was a child", geezer-story. I
wanted to work in the "We had to walk 9 miles uphill and back carrying
our little brother on our shoulders", but I think that's more effective
as a winter "geezer story". Don't you? |
|
Adding Insult to Injury ... I have recently discovered that my present housing dilemna has a few unexpected twists. TVHP (i.e. the actual property owner/landlord) is not in fact the author of this debacle as I was led to believe. CAP (i.e. my supposed HIV housing managers/advocates) is. Could someone reach around maybe ... Bewtween my shoulder blades ... There seems to be ...something stuck ... in ...my ... back. |







Even
if you went to the beach, you might have put some zinc on your nose, or
maybe some sunscreen on your face and shoulders (i.e." hot spots").
Getting "a little pink", or getting a "racoon face"
wasn't going to kill you. People just did not slather their entire bodies
down with SPF 3000.